I recently saw a headline on Digg that read "Unhackable Netbooks Given to Students" and it immediately peaked my interest. In my role at my school district I am constantly tinkering with the idea of student laptops and how I would implement them so I eagerly snap up ideas from people that have already implemented ubiquitous computing. The linked article from Australia focused primarily on the security measures the government agency responsible for the program had dreamed up in order to remain in control of the equipment (fixed asset BIOS, Windows 7 applocker, etc.).However, the discussion within the article's comments seemed to hit upon another level: several commentators felt that the program was the result of corporate sponsorship which actually reduced a child's capacity for learning instead of increasing it. How? By forcing students to utilize a Microsoft operating system (Windows 7), Microsoft productivity suite (Office), and Adobe creativity suite (CS4). These commentators felt that the students should have the option to utilize Open Office to complete assignments and they should not be forced to run Windows operating systems on machines that become their personal property after several years.
I tend to agree. I have seriously considered distributing Linux-based netbooks to students in my district, perhaps even giving them the choice to run Windows OS if they so choose - an event that has only been hampered by the lack of two things: Funding and Lack of Readiness (particularly teacher readiness to teach with laptops - a fault that primarily falls to me). I went so far as to purchase a 7" ASUS eeePC just to "try it out". Maybe it's time to bite off this project and get it going...





